Mia said, "Neither team had sufficient evidence for a true conviction- and I had nothing to argue for either team. In that case, voting with or against the majority accomplished only that."

If she was voting just to vote, why not just throw her lot in with the majority?

As it's just been proven, that move casted suspicion on her.

Now, let's examine what merit that vote did have...

It made her irresponsible for the deaths of Matt Engarde and Simon Keyes.

Does that make sense?