thefaceofjustice: (BADGE)
Bobby Fulbright ([personal profile] thefaceofjustice) wrote in [community profile] crybadger 2015-04-26 08:33 pm (UTC)

I conferred with Detective Gumshoe; he agreed with my reasoning, and I put in the vote. Of course, it's hardly a conclusion, as we can change our votes until it closes, but I still feel confident that I made the decision that is in the best interest of justice.

If you know you're a sheep, and you believe in me enough to repeat my own estimates about the wolves, then the odds you're looking at here aren't 33%... for you, they'd be closer to 100% confident that you know who today's wolf is. Why would you then want to take a mere 50% gamble, when you could try to convince the rest into ousting this supposed wolf? I think it's because we'll know if our third ousting was correct or not, and if you sent us after Mr. Dandy, and we find out he was innocent, that you would likely be the next target. You're hoping we'll burn off our last free mistake before we get to that.

I think you're getting desperate. Wolves win if at least one of their teams makes it to the end, right? So all they need is one team to gain enough trust. I'm sure they'd even sacrifice one of their own to seal that trust. But you're attempting this pretty late, Inspector Cabanela. Most of what you're saying here is only copying what I've already said. Like Prince Hans, all the help and investigating you've done so far has only been distraction from finding the wolves. You, an inspector, busied yourself with shooting locks and planting trackers instead of trying to uncover the wolves.

But it's not only you. Your partner stands out. We don't have enough testimony to know if anyone is telling the truth on who they cast their suspicion votes for, but for the first one, Mr. Pinkman echoed two earlier testimonies that claimed to vote for Mr. Lockhart and Mr. Springfield on the basis of trying to keep the votes leveled out. But when it came to ousting... he voted for Ms. Kelly and Dr. Grey, bringing the vote from what was 1-2 at the time to 1-3. If his voting behavior matched up to what he claimed it was for the suspicion poll, he would have voted again for Mr. Lockhart and Mr. Springfield, to bring it to 2-2.

Inconsistency like that is an enormous red flag, Inspector Cabanela!

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting