protoshepherd: (Default)
Proto Badger ([personal profile] protoshepherd) wrote in [community profile] crybadger2015-04-27 12:03 pm
Entry tags:

GAME 2 - Night 3

[ OOCly, the rules are pretty much clear! Sheep can win by voting out ALL the wolves. Wolves win when there are less than three sheep teams left. That is what it says on the rules feature of the cellphone, too. But it seems that the text earlier in the day stated otherwise...

It's about time for the suspicion poll to close. And to start off the new poll, everybody receives 1 new message. ]

prsn fird
lie abt ruls
cnnt lie
sheep win wen wolf r gone all wolf
wolf win... diff
nly wen les dan 3 sheep
cnnt lie abt ruls no more prsn
vot hu is wolf
hello
i am proto


[ However, there is no "reply" option yet again.

It's eerily unsettling how this text isn't as coherent and how the words aren't properly formed, huh? There doesn't seem to be anything new, either. There is no fresh food served - you'll have to make do with the breakfast food... which Dandy has conveniently thrown on the floor.

Hey! There's that vending machine. Raid that shit (aka punch it, break it, etc.). There's soda, potato chips, cookies, and other unhealthy snacks. It should at least tide everyone for the evening. ]

This poll is closed.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 3


hu is wolf

View Answers

Dick Gumshoe, Bobby Fulbright
3 (100.0%)

Inspector Cabanela, Jesse Pinkman
0 (0.0%)



---

[ 00 EST 28 April: Ousting poll draws to a close. A new day begins, with two teams out of the game. ]
yeahscience: ([4-5] what about a--)

[personal profile] yeahscience 2015-04-28 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Which is all still assuming a whole bunch of stuff. Like, assuming you're right about the Prince. Assuming you're right about Lockhart and Springfield, which, if you are? Why ain't they the ones on the chopping block, here?

And assuming that the badger's telling the truth when he's already lied to us, by the by. Assuming you ain't on his side. ASS - U - ME. Is it true you're LAPD? Doesn't that make you, like, more likely than any of us to be siding with him?
notaccurate: (02)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2015-04-28 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Truthfully, that there was why my suspicions were on them at first.
yeahscience: ([4-5] side the hell eye)

[personal profile] yeahscience 2015-04-28 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
...yeah, why the hell are we even talking to this guy? Either he's with the same org as the people that put us in here, or he's so freaking incompetent that they put him in here as like, what, a way of firing his ass? Either way, he's got mad connections and mad incentive here.
notaccurate: (07)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2015-04-28 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
I'm leaning more towards incompetent now, to be honest.

Though I suppose they could be a wolf AND incompetent.
yeahscience: ([1-3] twitchy)

[personal profile] yeahscience 2015-04-28 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
Why not? Team Hansel probably kinda was.