Proto Badger (
protoshepherd) wrote in
crybadger2015-10-18 06:01 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
GAME 3 - Day 2 Trial
[ whatever you're doing, wherever you are, suddenly, you'll see proto badger on any reflective surface. ]
Trial begins now. Talk about who is guilty.
Tell me in mind when ready.
(( VOTE HERE!! ))
Trial begins now. Talk about who is guilty.
Tell me in mind when ready.
(( VOTE HERE!! ))
no subject
But at the least, that seems more solid than the actual supposed evidence we've had to work with so far...
no subject
So, knowing that, why do YOU trust her word? What has happened that makes you so sure that she is being completely truthful?
no subject
I have heard the prosecutor's word personally, and I believe in it. The prosecutor investigated me on the first night, and we realized that we both were innocent. The proescutor then found out the Prosecutor Blackquill was guilty from last night's investigation.
I know that might not be substantial enough to believe, but how about this train of logic? If prosecutor was truly a fake, why didn't they try to manipulate the arguments yesterday? At that time, trying to sort through the planted evidence had us running in circles, and we needed someone new to point their fingers at. In fact, so many people ended up voting for no one at all.
no subject
[Believing someone because they have helped you before, that is something Sissel can understand.]
And the clues didn't point at him yesterday anyway, they pointed at the other guy. The one with the white fluffy thing around his neck. So does that mean they're working together? Or that bird-guy framed him?
1/2
no subject
At least we know that they're definitely not working together. According to the badger's reports, Prosecutor Blackquill was one of the ones who voted for Agent Lang yesterday. So if Blackquill is guilty, than Lang must be innocent. And he may very well have been the one to frame Lang... but it is hard for me to believe in Blackquill stooping to something like that.
no subject
[See he has this 'deductive reasoning' down!]
So out of the two, who do you think it is?
no subject
no subject
Is it possible for someone to claim to be something, if they aren't really that thing?
no subject
no subject
[He seems satisfied with the answer, though.]
no subject
no subject